by John Walters
A Modest Proposal
Every year I hear the same refrains:
- There’s nothing like the first weekend of March Madness and Don’t change a thing! (True and yes)
- College football’s playoff is about finding the best team in the sport (Why is that important?)
I’m perennially amused by the fact that the same folks who are in crazy, stupid love with March Madness seem so infatuated with determining the truly best team in college football. Does anyone really think FDU (above) is a better team than Purdue, or Princeton better than Arizona? In a seven-game series between either pair, whom are you taking?
Which is not to say that I’d change a thing about March Madness. I was listening to the final eight minutes of FDU-Purdue on the radio while driving and it was far more dramatic than any moment in this season’s CFB playoff—or at least right up there with the second half of Georgia-Ohio State—even though both these schools would fail to reach what is college hoops’ Round of 16.
So here is a modest proposal, one that would make college football a little more like March Madness while also appreciating that you cannot ask gridders to play that many games against that much top-tier competition on top of their regular seasons. Or at least that you should not.
I’m J-Dubbing it the “Sweet Sixteen Weekend.” Here’s how it works. Sixteen schools make the CFB playoffs, with at least four schools being outside the Power 5. These schools are seeded 1-16, just like in hoops. Now here’s where it becomes fun. The first two rounds, which are played on a Thurs-Sat or Wed-Fri (just like in college hoops, but avoiding Sunday for NFL reasons) are only 30-minute games. Two 15-minute halves.
So maybe you have No. 1 Georgia facing No. 16 Toledo in a first-round game that is actually only 30 minutes. The winner faces the winner of a similar game between Nos. 8-9 two days later, also a 30-minute game.
This has multiple benefits:
A) Less wear-and-tear on players
B) The same opportunities for magic as in the opening weekend of March Madness
C) More schools get a shot at the playoff
D) Most of these 1st- and even 2nd-round games will likely be blowouts anyway, so who needs 60 minutes when 30 minutes provides the answer we need (see: last January’s national championship game).
We all loved FDU’s win over Purdue, though everyone watching knew that while Purdue had a legit Final Four shot, FDU never would reach that spot. The better team lost, and no one was up in arms. If somehow Toledo shocked Georgia, why would or should we feel any different?
You thus have four playoff sites, sending four schools to each. After three days, you have a winner and now you’ve got a college football final four.
I can already hear the detractors: a 30-minute football game is not an actual game. So what? It’s still football. It’s more “football” than an overtime that eliminates special teams play. The shorter game gives the underdog a greater shot, which makes it more entertaining if for some reason Toledo builds a 10-0 first-quarter lead. Most importantly, this would make outstanding theater.
Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooal-keeper Goal
Gotta admit, I’d never seen a goalie score a goal off a goal kick (outside of 7 & 8 year-old leagues) before. If this also happens to be the climactic moment of season 3 of Ted Lasso, I wouldn’t be surprised.
Tim Brown & The Transfer Portal
Was ruminating on the transfer portal yesterday and thinking about my old college classmate, Tim Brown. It occurred to me that if the transfer portal existed in the 1980s, there’s almost no way Brown remains at Notre Dame four years and wins the Heisman Trophy (maybe he does win the Heisman Trophy somewhere else, but now way he remains in South Bend).
Brown’s first college play was a muffed kickoff that Purdue recovered and quickly leveraged into a touchdown. His freshman and sophomore years, he played well but the team stunk. They were better his junior season, Lou Holtz’s inaugural campaign, but still finished 5-6. Does a 2022 version of Tim Brown, a player with such spectacular talent, tough out three seasons of that? Even if his senior year was full of transcendent moments? I don’t think so.
And that’s what’s lost. And I don’t blame the current generation of college kids as much as I do the adults who’ve enabled that line of thinking: if things are tough, quit and leave. The Field-Turf is greener somewhere else.
Sure, there are many situations in which you’re in an abusive relationship or it’s not healthy for you to remain where you are. The majority of the time, however, the fault lies not in our stars but in ourselves. I’m glad Tim Brown never had that option. I imagine he is, too.
Scareway To Heaven
Nope. Uh-unh. Definitely not!
This is the Sky Ladder in Gosau, Austria, a 40-meter rope ladder whose photo speaks for itself. This is something humans are allowed to do, without a license. And Ron DeSantis is afraid of a few books. Puh-leeze.
Dollar Quiz
- Who is the only current Major League hitter in the all-time Top 30 in either batting average or OBP?
- Name another actor besides Marlon Brando who appeared in On The Waterfront (hint: three others were Oscar winners and a fourth deserved at least one)?
- Which planet’s rotational axis is 98 degrees, so that it looks more like a bowling ball rolling down a lane?
- Willis Reed just passed away at the age of 80. He was the starting center on on the 1973 New York Knicks, the last Knicks team to win an NBA championship. How many of Reed’s teammates from that squad besides Reed are in the Naismith Hall of Fame?
- Who founded the Rolling Stones (what member)?
OTW actors: Karl Malden, Rod Steiger, Lee J. Cobb, Eva Marie Saint.
Reed’s 1973 teammates: DeBusschere, Frazier, Bradley, Monroe (if he’s not in, he should be), Phil Jackson.
Swearing on my mother’s grave, I did not Google.
As always, Wendell, cannot comment on answers until I receive a 100% answer sheet or until much later in day…
Thank you for playing. We’ll have some lovely parting gifts, including a $100 gift certificate from the Spiegel Catalog.
1. Mike Trout
2. Karl Malden
3. Neptune would be my guess
4. If it’s just players I’ll go with Frazier, Monroe, DeBusschere and Bradley (Phil Jackson is in as a coach)
5. Brian Jones (#nojonesnostones)
*4. And I just realized I forgot Jerry Lucas!
Not 100, Brian, but I love your No. 5
“If things are tough, quit and leave” is a really over-simplified description of the transfer portal. First, a significant percentage of transfers arise from coaches encouraging it, i.e., telling a player “you’re not going to play here, so you’re better off leaving.” Rick Pitino already announced, without having seen any of his new St. John’s players play even a minute, that many of them “probably won’t be back” meaning that he is going to lift their scholarship. Deion Sanders is practically being lionized for announcing that he he is cleaning house at CU, meaning getting rid of players in favor of his own transfers. Why not criticize them for “seeing players through the tough times?” The new transfer rules frankly benefit coaches, as it more easily allows them opens up spots to bring in new players (the same coaches who do this — virtually all of them — will still publicly bemoan the younger generation’s lack of loyalty). It also allows coaches to get out from under their own recruiting mistakes.
Second, a student only has a very short time to play his sport collegiately, and limited places to do it. If he sees he isn’t likely to play and wants to go somewhere where he will, why shouldn’t he? Or if he wants to play on TV more, or for a better chance at a title, or for more NIL money, why criticize his character for doing so?
1. Mike Trout
2. Rod Steiger
3. Uranus. Looks like its on its side with the rings.
4. 6 : Frazier, Monroe, Lucas, Bradley, DeBusschere, & Phil Jackson
5. Brian Jones
Correct! Again
The transfer portal sucks – there has to be some regulations. I’m not sure what the right answer is – and each party to the situation (players, coaches, fans, boosters) have their own ideas as to what’s best. We ought to dust off the old “compromise” word and take it for a spin sometime to see if we can get some semblance of a better system.
Also – I’m sort of new to watching soccer (European football?), influenced by multiple factors: (1) my hometown, though not the place I currently live, just embarked on it’s inaugural season w/ an MLS team; (2) the WC was fun this year; (3) my daughter plays the sport; and (4) T-Mobile gave me a free year of the MLS season pass. I don’t think it’ll beat out football, baseball or hockey for me, but it’s sort of an interesting sport.
That said, it’s frustrating. I can’t quite put my finger on why, but I think the one thing I wish they’d do is shoot more. I mean, the goalies (as seen above) can kick the ball the length of the field. Why not put the ball on net more and see what happens? Stretch the field out like Steph Curry stretched out the basketball court with his 3-point range. Just my less than 2-cents. Carry on.